[Iraq] The al-Sadr ceasefire burns out?

Largely as a result of portions (described in some sources as "splinter groups") of the Mahdi Army engaging in illegal smuggling activities in Basra (which increased, accompanied by higher levels of violence when the UK pulled out), the US and Iraqi armies have launched what is, in essence, a militarized police action against the Shia militia.

[In sourcing this diary I'm using new first-hand reporting from the New York Times and Christian Science Monitor.]

This has had negative effects, either because the US/Iraqi forces are casting their net too wide and impacting all Mahdi Army members or the mainstream Mahdi Army itself is financing itself through these illegal smuggling actions and wants them to continue. Regardless, it has triggered an escalation in violence that jeopardizes the cease-fire that helped make the Bush/McCain surge strategy look successful.

In Basra:

The oil-export city of Basra became a battleground Tuesday as Iraqi forces, backed by US air power, launched a major crackdown on the Mahdi Army elements. British and US forces were guarding the border with Iran to intercept incoming weapons or fighters, according to a senior security official in Basra. [Christian Science Monitor]

As you can see they're blaming Iran to some degree, as Petraeus did recently. I'm not sure what good that does anyone, and in fact this seems more like a pushback on law enforcement more than international destabilization. Who knows, it could be Iran-guided as well. But most of the fighting seems to be in long-established Sadr/Mahdi Army controlled regions, and my guess is the recent escalation of violence is far more domestically inspired than not:

Tires burned in the [Sadr] city center, gunfire echoed against the shuttered stores and teams of fighters in pick-up trucks moved about brandishing machine guns, sniper rifles and rocket propelled grenades.

"We are doing this in reaction to the unprovoked military operations against the Mahdi Army," said a Mahdi commander who identified himself as Abu Mortada. "The U.S., the Iraqi government and SCIRI are against us," he said, referring to a rival Shia group. "They are trying to finish us. They want power for the Iraqi government and SCIRI." [New York Times]

The Basra-based official said that fighting is now centered in Mahdi Army strongholds in the neighborhoods of Tamimiyah, Hayaniyah, and Five Miles, and that there was also fighting in the neighboring provinces of Nasiriyah and Maysan. [CSM]

More attacks in Baghdad, hinting that the general revolt among Mahdi Army fighters is, indeed national:

In Baghdad, the mood was tense and some areas were deserted as clashes broke out across the city. In downtown Baghdad, checkpoints blocked sparse traffic every 100 yards.

Saeed Ammar, a government employee, said that he was standing near policemen in the Huriya neighborhood this morning when he was approached by Mahdi Army members. "They told me not to stand near checkpoints. They said, `We are waiting for the word from Moktada al-Sadr to attack the checkpoints -- it may come at any moment.'"[NYT]

Rockets fired from the capital's Shiite district of Sadr City slammed into the Green Zone Tuesday, the second time in three days.

[...]

On Monday evening, pickup trucks filled with chanting Mahdi militiamen, within sight of Iraqi forces, were forcing shopkeepers in many parts of Baghdad's west side to close in protest of US and Iraq Army raids.

On Tuesday, all shops in the Mahdi Army stronghold neighborhoods - Bayiaa, Iskan, Shuala, and Washash - were shuttered. Leaflets saying "No, no to America" were plastered on each storefront. Anti-American banners hung right next to Iraqi government checkpoints.

[...]

"The cease-fire is over; we have been told to fight the Americans," said one Mahdi Army militiaman, who was reached by telephone in Sadr City [Baghdad]. This same man, when interviewed in January, had stated that he was abiding by the cease-fire and that he was keeping busy running his cellular phone store. [CSM]

These last few paragraphs show this is the most dangerous escalation in violence in a while because it's affecting the economy and daily life of Iraqis in a way that leads to more out-of-work Iraqi youth and general anarchy.

Most importantly, the US and Iraqi governments are seemingly going to have to make a decision they've put off for years now. Do they eradicate Sadr or deal with him? Do they try for a wholly lawful state or incorporate an element of thuggery into their economy? If they want a al-Sadr free country with a totally legit economy, they may pay for it in blood.

[crossposted at Dailykos and Booman Tribune]
Poll
For a more secure Iraq, the US and Iraqi governments should:
Eradicate al-Sadr's power base through civil war.
Encorporate al-Sadr's power base into the government through compromise.
Ignore al-Sadr's power base and hope Iraqis will be repulsed by violence.
Whatevz.

Votes: 5
Results : Vote Link : Polls

Display:


Anyone (2.00 / 2)

want to start a pool on which Republican will be the first to blame on the left -- the surge was going so well and you America haters had to ask if it was going well?


by zonk on Tue Mar 25, 2008 at 07:52:24 PM EST

Re: [Iraq] The al-Sadr ceasefire burns out? (none / 0)

There was a report, I think it was London Economic Reviews, but am not sure...about how we were just paying off people, and they were using that to buy more arms, and as soon as the cash stopped the peace would stop.

Do you know the article I'm referring too?


Bring Back MyDD - Just say No to Rec'ing Candidate Diaries.
by CardBoard on Tue Mar 25, 2008 at 07:57:24 PM EST

Of Unpaid Sawhas and Smuggling Mahdis (none / 0)

The Guardian:

The success of the US "surge" strategy in Iraq may be under threat as Sunni militia employed by the US to fight al-Qaida are warning of a national strike because they are not being paid regularly.

Leading members of the 80,000-strong Sahwa, or awakening, councils have said they will stop fighting unless payment of their $10 a day (£5) wage is resumed. The fighters are accusing the US military of using them to clear al-Qaida militants from dangerous areas and then abandoning them.

A telephone survey by GuardianFilms for Channel 4 News reveals that out of 49 Sahwa councils four with more than 1,400 men have already quit, 38 are threatening to go on strike and two already have. [Guardian UK]

The Mahdi Army is Shia, however, so the striking Sunnis (part of the "Awakening" group so touted by McCain and Bush) would represent a completely separate faction.

And instead of re-engaging against the US and Iraqi gov't forces in Iraq (as the Mahdi Army seems poised to do) the Sawha groups would stop working for the Americans and it'd likely take a little while for those bored and unpaid militants to wholly take up arms against America. So that's maybe better described as a middle-term threat as opposed to the end of the cease-fire which is a short-term threat.


by Addison on Tue Mar 25, 2008 at 08:12:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: [Iraq] The al-Sadr ceasefire burns out? (none / 0)

What you're writing is silly and impossible because  the surge has worked and Iraq is peaceful.


by Johnny Gentle Famous Crooner on Tue Mar 25, 2008 at 08:14:21 PM EST

Re: [Iraq] The al-Sadr ceasefire burns out? (none / 0)

Your only mistake was in your title.
If you would have led with
"Do Obama and Clinton believe the Sadar worm has turned?...you would have at least 50 comments...

http://icasualties.org/oif/

Hope folks watched Bush's War pt 1 last night..
pt 2 tonight on PBS...


"If you want to end war and stuff, you gotta sing loud"...Arlo Guthrie
by nogo war on Tue Mar 25, 2008 at 09:01:07 PM EST

Re: [Iraq] The al-Sadr ceasefire burns out? (none / 0)

The more violence increases, the better chances for a democratic president.  I think we should just be quiet and let the Rethugs drown in their idiocy.


Until recently I was selling drugs, and now I'm selling Obama T-shirts.
by switching sides on Wed Mar 26, 2008 at 04:42:29 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.